Adopt a wise middle course, and, perhaps,
with God's aid, you may often cure them."
Under certain circumstances some Catholic theologians have
permitted a married woman to masturbate. Thus, the Jesuit
theologian, Gury, asserts that the wife does not sin "_quae se
ipsam tactibus excitat ad seminationem statim post copulam in qua
vir solus seminavit_." This teaching seems to have been
misunderstood, since ethical and even medical writers have
expended a certain amount of moral indignation on the Church
whose theologians committed themselves to this statement. As a
matter of fact, this qualified permission to masturbate merely
rests on a false theory of procreation, which is clearly
expressed in the word _seminatio_. It was believed that
ejaculation in the woman is as necessary to fecundation as
ejaculation in the man. Galen, Avicenna, and Aquinas recognized,
indeed, that such feminine semination was not necessary; Sanchez,
however, was doubtful, while Suarez and Zacchia, following
Hippocrates, regarded it as necessary. As sexual intercourse
without fecundation is not approved by the Catholic Church, it
thus became logically necessary to permit women to masturbate
whenever the ejaculation of mucus had not occurred at or before
coitus.
The belief that the emission of vaginal mucus, under the
influence of sexual excitement in women, corresponded to
spermatic emission, has led to the practice of masturbation on
hygienic grounds.
Pages:
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500