The confidence of the public is
continually bolstered up by such descriptions as the editorial above
mentioned.
A NEW YORK ARCHITECT.
* * * * *
A SEEMING ATTEMPT TO DEFRAUD AN ARCHITECT.
PITTSBURGH, PA., December 30, 1889.
TO THE EDITORS OF THE AMERICAN ARCHITECT:
_Dear Sirs_,--Please answer through the columns of your valuable journal
the following:
I will designate A as the party for whom I drew plans, etc., B as the
owner of property adjoining, and C as the contractor for A. I drew up
plans and specifications for a 60' 0" front by 60' 0" deep building for
A, including party-wall for A and B who has 35' 0" front by 60' 0" deep
lot. I was employed to render full services, such as to draw up plans,
specifications, details and superintend the construction of said
building for A.
A wrote to me asking me whether I would allow B to use my plans and
specifications to be copied. I answered, emphatically, that not under
any circumstances would I allow it without compensation, as the plans,
etc., were my property, and were only designed for A.
A let the contract for erection and completion of the building to C, I
having made the articles of agreement for same.
In the meantime I was notified that B and C were taking sub-bids for
the erection of the 35' 0" building, all with my plans and
specifications.
Pages:
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114